01
DPO / Privacy Lead
Receives the data principal complaint log and the consent records for the affected cohort.
Fortis Drill #01
Ninety minutes. Five seats. One incident, two regulatory clocks running in parallel from the moment your team says it became aware. Scored against the rule text, not against opinion.
The setup
Arclight Finserv is a mid-size Indian consumer lending platform with 3.2 million customers. A KYC document store operated by one of its processors has been indexed by a search engine. A journalist has the link. Support has three tickets open that nobody has connected yet.
Your team walks in at 06:40 with what Arclight actually knows — which is very little, unevenly distributed, and some of it wrong.
Fictional company, real statutes. Deliberate — no trademark exposure, full regulatory fidelity.
Incident file · ARC-2026-0417
The five seats
01
Receives the data principal complaint log and the consent records for the affected cohort.
02
Receives the processor's access logs — including the timestamp that moves awareness eleven days.
03
Receives the processor agreement, and the clause that does not say what everyone assumes it says.
04
Receives the containment options, each with a cost in downtime and in destroyed evidence.
05
Receives the journalist's email, with a deadline earlier than any of the statutory ones.
Information is role-gated. No one seat sees everything — which is the point.
The dual clock
Both clocks start at awareness. The CERT-In window closes before most incident bridges have finished their first handover call.
CERT-In occupies 8.3% of the DPDP window. Teams routinely plan for the 72 and miss the 6.
The awareness trap
Set the moment your organisation became aware. The four statutory deadlines compute from it. Then find out what happens when the logs disagree with you.
Awareness parameters
RBI outsourcing directions stack on top: your processor is your obligation.
Direction 20(3)/2022 · 6h window
DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 7(1) · without delay
Rule 7(1)(b) · without delay
Rule 7(2) · 72h window
The three filings
Filing 01 · 6h
Submitted on the prescribed format, with the facts you can actually stand behind at hour six.
Filing 02 · Rule 7(1)
Nature, extent, timing and likely impact — written before the forensics are finished.
Filing 03 · Rule 7(1)(b)
Plain language, no hedging, and a stated action the customer can take today.
Scoring
| Dimension | Weight |
|---|---|
| Clock compliance | 30 |
| Notification accuracy | 20 |
| Containment and forensics | 15 |
| Documentation and evidence | 15 |
| Stakeholder communication | 10 |
| Legal exposure | 10 |
Read the full rubric — we publish it
We score the team, never individuals. No participant is named or ranked in anything that reaches your board.
Immune Response Report · 18 pages
This is why it comes out of the compliance budget, not L&D.
The report
Objections
Facilitated, once a year, unscored. This is timed, graded against the rule text, and produces an attestation you can hand an auditor. And you can re-run it next quarter to show improvement.
Pricing
₹2,40,000
One session, five seats, full report.
₹7,80,000
Four drills a year, escalating scenarios, trend reporting.
On request
Multiple subsidiaries, shared processor estate, one incident.
Next available slots: August 2026 · Hyderabad, Mumbai, Bengaluru, or remote.